Product liability law exists for consumers who are injured by faulty devices or poor warning labels.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission reports that more than $700 billion annually is spent on deaths, injuries and property damage resulting from product liability accidents in the U.S. Many of these cases are resolved without having to go to court; however, having a legal representative on your side is a must in order to ensure you are receiving adequate compensation, whether you go to court or not.
Make sure to do careful research before selecting a product liability attorney. This is a highly concentrated field, and each product defect is a specialty in and of itself.
Here are some questions to ask before picking a lawyer:
Personal Injury Attorney Interview Sheet
Worksheet with questions to ask a personal injury attorney to help determine if he or she will be a good fit for your case
Download in PDF format
Once you know what to look for in an attorney, you can start searching.
Picking an attorney is the hardest part. When you finally sit down with him or her, you’ll want to have everything ready: hospital bills, medical reports, receipts from the manufacturer, the product in question, and anything else related to your case.
A good attorney will not charge for an initial consultation. If they do, you might want to find different representation. Learn all about attorney’s fees.
Your First Meeting with an Attorney
A worksheet to prepare for your first meeting with a personal injury attorney – what to bring, what they'll ask
Download in PDF format
Make sure to outline a solid fee agreement and keep in contact with your attorney so that you know what’s happening with your case.
Not sure what type of product liability case you have? Learn more below.
There are three main types of faulty product claims.
If a product was designed poorly or was not adequately tested, this likely means that the product will be below standards and dangerous to use. This aspect of a product liability cases focuses on the manufacturer’s decisions when making the product. How did they plan it? Was there a defect in the design that made it unreasonably dangerous?
Liability exists where there is a foreseeable risk posed by the product when it was used for its intended purpose. Many states require the plaintiffs show that the risk could have been mitigated by adopting an alternative design that was economically feasible and in harmony with the product’s intended purpose.
Ready to find the right lawyer now? [Change "Attorney Directory" to Search our directory – drop down box]
For example, could the defendant still make a toy train without lead paint in a way that would not cost too much? You’d need the estimated cost of non-lead paint and the estimated cost of lead paint, multiplied by the estimated number of little children with lead-related injuries. If the cost of non-lead paint is less than the cost of medical bills, then the non-lead paint option would be considered economically feasible.
As crass as it sounds, most product liability cases live and die around how much is “too much.” To answer this, courts discuss what’s known as the “cost-benefit analysis.” They estimate the additional cost of the safer design against the cost of the damage incurred if the modification isn’t made. This can also include costs like medical bills and lawsuits. In terms of legal costs, there are two legal claims that are discussed: strict liability and negligence.
Negligence is when the manufacturer knew or should have known of the danger associated with the way he designed the product. The analysis would thus be focused on his conduct. Was he aware that he could have made the toy safer?
Strict liability, on the other hand, is when a manufacturer puts a defective product in the market when it poses an unreasonable danger. Even if he was careful, the manufacturer may still be held liable. The focus is on the product, not on the manufacturer’s conduct or state of mind.
Some jurisdictions still use the “consumer expectations test,” in which the court asks whether the danger posed by the product goes beyond the consumer’s ordinary expectations. However, since that is a very subjective standard, most jurisdictions have left it behind.
This product got through the design phase without a scratch, but the actual making of the product was with poor materials or cheap labor. They do this in an attempt to turn a quick profit or by trying to slip under federal safety standards. It might not affect all of the products in the assembly line, but enough of them will be below quality standards.
Examples of a manufacturing defect could be a playset with a cracked part or a metal pin for surgical replacement that has hairline fractures because of substandard metallurgy practices. When these eventually harm the consumer, the manufacturer can be found liable.
Unlike a design defect, the manufacturer did not plan for a defect in this case. Damages in this case will be determined by strict liability, which means the manufacturer is responsible for any injuries despite the level of care he took in making the products.
If a plaintiff can prove that a defect caused his injuries and also provide proof that eliminates other possible causes, then the plaintiff can prove causation – even if the original product is damaged or lost. This is called the “malfunction doctrine.”
This defect is found in the labels and warnings on a product. Were there clear instructions to help consumers avoid injuries? If not, the producer and manufacturer could be held liable. This means a product can still be considered dangerous even if there wasn’t a design defect and it was still manufactured according to proper industry standards. If there was a foreseeable risk of harm because of inadequate instructions or warnings, that would render the product unsafe.
A manufacturer has two related duties when creating instructions: 1) they have to warn users of hidden dangers that might be present in the product, and 2) they must instruct users how to use that product safely.
The sheer number of food-related illnesses in the United States every year is astounding – an estimated 48 million cases.
These are typically brought as product liability cases, as attorneys can file against anyone in the chain of distribution, from the manufacturer to the restaurant. While most of these stomach bugs subside in a couple days without serious injury, some deliver life-threatening bacteria and viruses, such as Salmonella, Listeria, E. coli and others. The damage from these cases is usually obvious, but tying it back to a specific meal at a particular restaurant is extremely difficult. In these cases, a product liability attorney is frequently called upon to tie the loose threads together and deliver the necessary evidence.
In a product liability suit, the plaintiff has to prove four things:
Ready to find the right lawyer now? [Change "Attorney Directory" to Search our directory – drop down box]
A competent product liability attorney can help you get damages for lost wages, medical costs (present and future), pain and suffering, and emotional anguish. These are “compensatory” damages, in that they’re intended to make the plaintiff whole again. Special damages are intended to reimburse the plaintiff for out-of-pocket expenses like hospital bills or lost wages, while general damages are pain and suffering – the more intangible costs.
Damages/Expenses Worksheet
Damages worksheet to track expenses for your injury claim (medical treatment, property damage, lost wages, prescriptions)
Download in PDF format
Whether you or a family member suffered an injury from a defective toy, medical device or contaminated food item, find out if you have grounds for a lawsuit by getting in touch with a product liability lawyer as soon as possible before your time to bring a claim expires. See the Enjuris law firm directory.